TORONTO – Silvercorp Metals and Guyana Goldfields have agreed to amend the terms of their merger arrangement, which would see Silvercorp making a significantly higher offer than the previously announced $105 million deal.
The parties came to a new agreement following receipt by Guyana Goldfields of an unsolicited all-cash proposal from a third party to acquire the company. Last week, Guyana Goldfields rejected an all-stock offer from Gran Colombia Gold as it was keen on pursuing a merger with Silvercorp.
Under the new terms, Guyana Goldfields shareholders will now receive, for each share held, $0.25 in cash and 0.1849 of a Silvercorp common share for total consideration of $1.30 per share. The improved offer would value Guyana Goldfields at approximately $227 million.
After accounting for Silvercorp’s existing shares, the cash consideration of $0.25 implies a total cash component of $39.5 million, and the share consideration of $1.05 implies a total share component of 29.2 million shares, Silvercorp said in a statement.
Based on these metrics, existing Guyana Goldfields shareholders would own 14.4% of Silvercorp’s pro forma basic shares outstanding following the transaction.
In the original offer, Guyana Goldfields shareholders were given the option to receive either $0.60 in cash or 0.1195 of a Silvercorp common share, subject to a maximum cash consideration of $33.2 million, which would lead to ownership of 7.1% of Silvercorp’s pro forma basic shares outstanding, assuming maximum cash consideration.
The amended agreement also increases the termination fee to $9.0 million, which is to be paid by Guyana Goldfields if the agreement is terminated in certain specified circumstances.
As of Monday, Silvercorp holds approximately 16.55 million Guyana Goldfields shares, representing 9.48% of those issued and outstanding.
Shares of Silvercorp jumped as high as 10.6% on Monday following the amended merger. Guyana Goldfields’ stock was also up 2.2% on the TSX. The mining firms have market capitalizations of $1.1 billion and $164.1 million respectively.
This story originally appeared onwww.Mining.com.