• Jobs
  • Digital Edition
  • Press Releases
  • Buyers’ Guide
  • TNM Maps
  • Profile
  • Sign out
  • Regions
    • Canada
    • United States
    • Australia, NZ & South Pacific
    • Mexico and Central America
    • North America
  • Commodities
    • Gold
    • Copper
    • Diamonds
    • Silver
    • Zinc and Lead
    • Nickel
    • Uranium
    • Iron Ore
  • Commentary
    • Commentary
    • Editorial
  • ESG
    • Indigenous Issues
    • Sustainability
    • Environment
  • Suppliers & Equipment
    • Machinery and Equipment
    • Machinery and Equipment Maintenance
    • Technology & innovation
  • Events
    • Canadian Mining Symposium | October 12 + 13, 2023 | London, UK
    • Superior Glove Webinar | August 15, 2023
    • Upcoming Events
    • Submit an Event
  • Contact
  • Subscribe
    • Magazine
    • Newsletter
  • Advertise

Reader Rebuttal (January 01, 2004)

Canadian Mining Journal Staff | January 1, 2004 | 12:00 am

Bema should have made the ‘Top 40’

After looking at your September 2003 issue I was surprised to see that our company wasn’t included in your top 40 by revenue chart. Last year, Bema Gold Corp. had revenues of US$36.3 million, which would probably have placed us in 32nd place.

Derek Iwanaka, Investor Relations Assistant

Bema Gold Corporation,

Vancouver, B.C.

Concerned about CMJ’s criticism of Diavik

The editorial by Jane Werniuk in the December 2003 issue of the Journal should be a cause for concern to many mining people, where the plan to increase production and profits should come into question by a magazine whose primary support comes from the mining industry. When Diavik states that they expect a mine life of 16 to 22 years, where is Jane coming from when she says, “In the world of exploration that is more of a hope than an expectation.” She seems to forget that the name of the game of mining is to make a profit so you can stay in business, find more ore and continue providing as stable an employment environment as any other industry.

And what is the great concern about the environment? This part of Canada used to be referred to as the ‘Great Canadian Wastelands’ that would freeze the extremities off the proverbial brass monkey for six months of the year and feed the mosquitoes the rest of the year. Now to satisfy the enviro-religions and the news media, this patch of otherwise unused tundra is sanctified.

Sure the mines are providing jobs for locals and natives that didn’t exist before, but the obligation of the company should not stretch into providing employment forever. Let’s get real over expectations and stop trying to second-guess the management, who also have a stake in the profit and continuity.

Clifford C. Rennie, P.Eng.

Nanaimo, B.C.


Comments

Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Subscribe
Digital Edition

Editions

  • Subscribe
  • Digital Editions

About

  • Media Kit
  • Contact Us
  • Policies and Terms

The Northern Miner Group

  • TheNorthernMiner
  • Mining.com

Canadian Mining Journal provides information on new Canadian mining and exploration trends, technologies, mining operations, corporate developments and industry events.

Funded by the Government of Canada
© 2025 The Northern Miner Group, All Rights Reserved