The economics of workplace safety: part 1

Today and tomorrow, CMJ is taking a look at the cost savings that accrue in a safe workplace. Everyone talks about safety, […]
Inefficient conveyor operation leads to unplanned downtime, fugitive materials and increased maintenance. Credit: Martin Engineering

Today and tomorrow, CMJ is taking a look at the cost savings that accrue in a safe workplace. Everyone talks about safety, and now there is a means of quantifying the benefit.

Conveyor safety is not a modern trend bred by government regulation – it is a common-sense idea as old as the first conveyor design. In the modern age, safety is a key factor in worker protection, reduced insurance rates and a lower total cost of operation. There are several hurdles to the installation of safety equipment, the biggest of which is the near-universal use of the low bid process.

When companies buy on price (the lowest bid), the benefits are short-lived, and costs typically increase over time. In contrast, when purchases are made based on lowest long term cost (life cycle cost), benefits usually continue to accrue and costs go down, resulting in a net savings over time. Safer and more reliable equipment is easier to service, has a longer life and is less expensive to maintain.

Figure 1: Life Cycle Costs

Organizations that embrace safety show significant performance advantages over the competition. The proof is reflected in reduced injuries and greater productivity, along with above industry average financial returns and higher share prices.

Justifying safety investments is greatly enhanced by quantifying what most financial managers refer to as “intangible costs”, i.e., injuries, lost labour, insurance, morale, legal settlements, etc. However, managers and accountants have been trained to think about saving direct costs to justify investments. 

When conveyors operate inefficiently, they have unplanned stoppages, release large quantities of fugitive materials and require more maintenance. Emergency breakdowns, cleaning of excessive spillage and reactive maintenance all contribute to an unsafe workplace.

Safety pays

Numerous case studies revealing the positive relationships between safety and productivity are backed up by organizations that gather global statistics on accidents and incidents. The simple formula for return on investment (dividing savings by cost) does not capture the potential savings from safety investments. Several organizations provide detailed and regional statistics on the cost of accidents.

Figure 2. Regional Statistics on Costs of Accidents

Read tomorrow’s CMJ newsletter for the balance of this article and learn how to estimate the costs of an unsafe workplace.


Your email address will not be published.

Feb 13 2023 - Feb 15 2023
Mar 05 2023 - Mar 08 2023
Mar 06 2023 - Mar 07 2023