TORONTO – An unprecedented Supreme Court of Canada decision, allowing two British Columbia First Nations to file for damages against aluminum industry giant Rio Tinto
, could have dire implications for economic development projects across the country, concludes a new study released today by the Fraser Institute
, an independent, non-partisan Canadian public policy think tank.
The study, Economic Development in Jeopardy? Implications of the Saik’uz First Nation and Stellat’en First Nation v. Rio Tinto Decision
, spotlights the October 2015 Supreme Court decision to uphold a BC Court of Appeal ruling that paves the way for First Nations to file for damages against private parties (ie: companies, individuals or non-government entities) without proving aboriginal title first.
“Simply claiming aboriginal title is now enough to bring forward litigation against private parties – litigation that was previously only brought against provincial and federal governments,” said Ravina Bains, study author and associate director of aboriginal policy studies at the Fraser Institute.
The case involves Rio Tinto’s Kenney Dam which has operated for more than 60 years on the Nechako River in northeastern British Columbia.
The Saik’uz and Stellat’en First Nations, who have not proven aboriginal title to the land in question, claim the dam is causing significant environmental harm to the river and thus negatively affecting their fishing resource.
The Supreme Court upheld the earlier BC Court of Appeal ruling that the two First Nations could move forward with the complaint asserting – for the first time – that aboriginal title does not have to be proven before bringing a claim against a private party for damages.
According to the study, the court decision will not only put established projects at risk, but put a chill on new economic development projects and create further uncertainty for First Nations pursuing clarity on aboriginal title.
“Previous claims of aboriginal title have always been brought against the Crown yet this unprecedented ruling exposes private parties to litigation even when, like in Rio Tinto’s case, the private company is operating under provincial government license on land it bought from the government in the 1950s,” Bains said.
“With an increase in litigation, this ruling could put all current and future economic development projects in jeopardy especially in provinces such as British Columbia where more than 100% of the province is currently under claim by First Nations.”
Please visit FraserInstitute.org
this is good for the first nation they are the first people here and thier land was taken from them so they should have the right for what ever they need to survive or to keep for thier people that should be thier right we are the ones that came here after the fact give it to them its thier right
So, that means all of you need to give all the land back and move back to Europe too? Where do you stop with original claims?
Oh my !! Yet another Supreme Court judge making a ruling against all Canadians best interests. Makes no logical sense whatsoever. What in the world is going on people ?
Are you sure they were the first here?
This is only applicable for BC Indian bands.
IIRC, almost all other bands are signatories to treaty, therefore they no longer have any claims.